English Language Arts Regents Review Sheet
The ELA Regents rewards clear thinking on the page. Every question and essay tests: can you say what the text says, and back it up?
Big ideas
- Every passage has ONE central idea. Everything else supports it. Find the idea first, then everything else clicks.
- 'Author's craft' = the choices the author made and WHY. Ask 'what did they gain by choosing this word/order/image?'
- Every essay: claim + evidence + analysis. Analysis is the biggest missing ingredient in weak essays.
Reading comprehension strategy
Active reading = better comprehension. Don't just move eyes — engage.
Underline the thesis, circle transitions, mark tone shifts. Even a * next to key sentences helps.
Main idea = big claim. Details = evidence supporting it. Regents loves 'which best describes the passage'.
Tone = author's attitude toward subject. Look at word CHOICE. Ironic, nostalgic, indignant, reverent, skeptical — memorize a bank.
Not stated directly. Read between lines. But you must POINT to a specific line as evidence.
Trap: 'Best supported by the text' — the answer must be provable from the passage. Not what you personally think or would say.
Tip: Read the questions FIRST (skim), then read the passage. You'll know what to look for.
Literary devices with examples
Devices are tools. Know the tool AND why the author would pick it.
Simile: 'like' or 'as' ('brave as a lion'). Metaphor: is/are ('life is a highway').
Giving human traits to non-humans. 'The wind whispered.'
Alliteration: same starting consonant ('Peter Piper picked'). Assonance: same VOWEL sound.
Symbol: object standing for a bigger idea (dove = peace). Imagery: vivid sensory details.
Verbal (says opposite of meaning). Situational (opposite of expected outcome). Dramatic (audience knows something character doesn't).
Trap: For 'author's use of X device' questions, name the device AND explain the effect. Just naming isn't enough.
Tip: 'What does this metaphor emphasize?' → the connection between the two things. What quality do they share?
Argument writing (Part 2)
Argue a position using multiple sources. Analyze evidence — don't just cite it.
1. Intro with clear claim. 2. Body paragraphs, one per reason with evidence + analysis. 3. Address counterclaim. 4. Conclusion.
You HAVE to reference the provided texts. Use (Text 1), (Text 2), etc.
Acknowledge the other side ('some may argue...'), then rebut ('however, ...'). Shows sophistication.
Don't just retell the source. Explain WHY the evidence supports your claim. That 'why' is the missing ingredient.
Trap: Just summarizing sources without your own argument = low score. Your ANALYSIS is what earns the top rubric level.
Tip: Score 6 essays sound confident and specific. Practice writing thesis statements that take a strong, clear stance.
Text-analysis response (Part 3)
Explain how the author develops a central idea using specific literary elements/techniques.
1. Identify central idea. 2. Name 1-2 techniques the author uses to develop it. 3. Cite specific text evidence. 4. Explain HOW each technique develops that idea.
Topic = what the passage is about (war). Central idea = the point the author makes ABOUT the topic (war destroys innocence).
Part 3 is ONE well-organized paragraph. Not an essay. Focus on quality over quantity.
Trap: Don't just LIST literary elements. Explain how they contribute to the central idea. That 'how' is the whole point.
Tip: Memorize a small toolkit of go-to techniques: imagery, tone, structure, characterization, symbolism. Any two of these work for most passages.
Grammar essentials + rubric awareness
Clear writing = better score. Master a few fundamentals to avoid dumb losses.
Singular subjects → singular verbs. 'The list of items IS long' (subject is 'list', not 'items').
Two independent clauses joined by JUST a comma. Fix with period, semicolon, or a coordinating conjunction.
Match forms in lists/comparisons. 'I like reading, writing, and to run' → BAD (mix of verb forms).
Regents ELA scored 1–6. Level 6 = insightful analysis, specific evidence, sophisticated language, no meaningful errors.
Trap: One or two grammar errors won't tank you. Meaning-obscuring errors WILL. Prioritize clarity.
Tip: Time management: leave 5 min at the end to proofread. Fix the most obvious errors first (fragments, tense shifts, subject-verb).
Frequently asked questions
How should I study for the English Language Arts Regents?
Work real past-exam questions by topic, review this one-page summary of the must-know concepts, and read the worked solution every time you miss one. The exam reuses the same ideas year after year.